All examples
Science · Grade 6
Which material absorbs more water?
Original AI-written criteria for fictional assignments; not official standards, student work or teacher-published rubrics.
The assignment
Test two materials using the same amount of water and the same waiting time. Repeat the test, then explain which material absorbed more.
What students make
A record of the test conditions, a results table and a short explanation using the measurements.
How to read this rubric
Compare each row across the levels. The skill stays the same; the quality of the work changes.
Scroll across to compare all four levels.
| Look for | Exceeding | Meeting | Approaching | Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I can | I can explain the pattern across repeated tests and account for unusual results, if any. | I can use my measurements to explain which material absorbed more water. | I can state which material absorbed more water and use some measurements to support it. | I can describe a result from my test. |
| Claim and evidence | Use repeated measurements to explain the pattern; address unusual results when present. | Use measurements from the repeated tests to support the claim. | Link some measurements to the claim; other results are not explained. | Name a result without explaining how it supports a claim. |
| Look for | Exceeding | Meeting | Approaching | Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I can | I can explain how the test conditions affect the comparison and judge its limits. | I can keep the test conditions the same so the materials can be compared. | I can keep some test conditions the same, but a difference may affect the result. | I can describe how I tested each material. |
| Test conditions | Explain which conditions matter and how a remaining difference could affect the comparison. | Use the same amount of water and waiting time for each material. | Keep one of these conditions the same but change another. | Test the materials under different conditions without accounting for the difference. |
What to notice
The claim and the supporting measurements stay together. The higher level asks for a better explanation of the results, rather than a longer report.